GAH
So, I must admit, I'm a little pissed at the wonderful organization we know best as the "Students' Union".
This is not surprising- I am usually a little pissed at the SU. However, this time is a little different seeing as I now an employee. Allow me to explain. As most of you who read this know, I am the new UPIO (University Policy Information Officer), which makes me a glorified research monkey. The problem is, if this week is any indication of the year to come, it will not be as easy as it sounds.
Day one: I arrive at the office at the bright and early (WAY too early) time of 10 am. My roomate Sarah (new AVP External) and I walk in ready to pretend that we own the world (especially since our bosses are away on retreat!). You can imagine our shock when we are informed that we "are not supposed to be there" yet. It seems that our bosses had accidently neglected to inform the permanent staff that we would be coming into work regardless of the fact that we would have no "direction" to speak of. So, of course, we have no keys, we have no computers (kind hard for a researcher), our offices are a mess, we don't even know WHICH office we're supposed to be in, and we are politely told that if we choose not to come in for the remainder of the week, that would be acceptable. Wow, great start for me!
Now, to most of you this might sound like an ideal situation- getting paid to not do anything is a pretty good idea, isn't it? Well, unfortunately that isn't the case since, while we may not have had much "direction" to work with, we sure had a lot of work to do. My boss left me with a pretty massive couple of things to look into. Moreover, I was kind of looking forward to getting a head start on projects that I know will be bitting my heels in no time. However, in order to do all of this, I must now work from home until everything is set up. Oh well, at least I got my business cards :) I can't wait for the exec to get home.
On a side note, my frustration does not end there. The former Students' Union Executive has decided to shut down the webboard as their last order of business. To date no one has been able to give me a logical reason WHY the webboard should be shut down. They have said nothing but "legal opinion" (which, brought uphaving been partially by a lawyer and a judge, I can tell you means a whole lot of squat). The real issue I have with this action is the overt decision to do it so late in the term. The old executive is not stupid (though some would argue otherwise) they knew this action would be controversial. And yet, they will happily stand back and watch a new, and so far innocent executive, deal with the repercussions.
I will not deny that the webboard needed to undergo some sort of reforms. It had become a tool of needless and childish attacks and ceased being as informative as it had once been. However, there are certain steps that I wish had been taken prior to the action.
1) Consulting with the webboard about what changes were deemed necessary and how they should be implemented.
2) Fair and adequate warning regarding the shutting down of the webboard, so that people could save private messages and so on.
3) A more informative reason for why (legal opinion simply doesn't cut it with me).
4) Not doing it prior to a week where the executive would be out of town and would be unable to be reached (even though the website says to contact hte vp student life).
5) Doing so in a time frame that would not cast a dark shadow upon the incoming exec would have been cool too.
Anyway, I'm tired now and done bitching for the moment. But yeah, SU as a whole isn't ranking too high in my books. Maybe that's because I'm tired, cranky and need a nap. That's probably it.
Toodles for now,
Zita
This is not surprising- I am usually a little pissed at the SU. However, this time is a little different seeing as I now an employee. Allow me to explain. As most of you who read this know, I am the new UPIO (University Policy Information Officer), which makes me a glorified research monkey. The problem is, if this week is any indication of the year to come, it will not be as easy as it sounds.
Day one: I arrive at the office at the bright and early (WAY too early) time of 10 am. My roomate Sarah (new AVP External) and I walk in ready to pretend that we own the world (especially since our bosses are away on retreat!). You can imagine our shock when we are informed that we "are not supposed to be there" yet. It seems that our bosses had accidently neglected to inform the permanent staff that we would be coming into work regardless of the fact that we would have no "direction" to speak of. So, of course, we have no keys, we have no computers (kind hard for a researcher), our offices are a mess, we don't even know WHICH office we're supposed to be in, and we are politely told that if we choose not to come in for the remainder of the week, that would be acceptable. Wow, great start for me!
Now, to most of you this might sound like an ideal situation- getting paid to not do anything is a pretty good idea, isn't it? Well, unfortunately that isn't the case since, while we may not have had much "direction" to work with, we sure had a lot of work to do. My boss left me with a pretty massive couple of things to look into. Moreover, I was kind of looking forward to getting a head start on projects that I know will be bitting my heels in no time. However, in order to do all of this, I must now work from home until everything is set up. Oh well, at least I got my business cards :) I can't wait for the exec to get home.
On a side note, my frustration does not end there. The former Students' Union Executive has decided to shut down the webboard as their last order of business. To date no one has been able to give me a logical reason WHY the webboard should be shut down. They have said nothing but "legal opinion" (which, brought uphaving been partially by a lawyer and a judge, I can tell you means a whole lot of squat). The real issue I have with this action is the overt decision to do it so late in the term. The old executive is not stupid (though some would argue otherwise) they knew this action would be controversial. And yet, they will happily stand back and watch a new, and so far innocent executive, deal with the repercussions.
I will not deny that the webboard needed to undergo some sort of reforms. It had become a tool of needless and childish attacks and ceased being as informative as it had once been. However, there are certain steps that I wish had been taken prior to the action.
1) Consulting with the webboard about what changes were deemed necessary and how they should be implemented.
2) Fair and adequate warning regarding the shutting down of the webboard, so that people could save private messages and so on.
3) A more informative reason for why (legal opinion simply doesn't cut it with me).
4) Not doing it prior to a week where the executive would be out of town and would be unable to be reached (even though the website says to contact hte vp student life).
5) Doing so in a time frame that would not cast a dark shadow upon the incoming exec would have been cool too.
Anyway, I'm tired now and done bitching for the moment. But yeah, SU as a whole isn't ranking too high in my books. Maybe that's because I'm tired, cranky and need a nap. That's probably it.
Toodles for now,
Zita
10 Comments:
At 3:42 PM, May 06, 2005, Chris said…
Well...you're fired.
At 6:39 PM, May 06, 2005, Anonymous said…
welcome to the SU?
Hope next week is better for you!
D :P
SU Executive Glorified Research Monkey
At 10:52 PM, May 06, 2005, Zita Dube said…
Alright, so I can admit when I have mispoken.
Jordan's rationale at council tonight for the webboard closure was acceptable. I still don't buy that they couldn't give proper heads up but none the less, I'm far more chill on that issue.
I'm also more chill on the crummy week. It wasn't that bad- I was just in a crummy mood. But it wasn't great- again, just not the highest note to start the year.
With that, thanks Dave. You're awesome. And Chris, thank god you don't have that perogative.
Zita
At 1:29 AM, May 08, 2005, "Steve Smith" said…
"Jordan's rationale at council tonight for the webboard closure was acceptable."
No it wasn't.
At 9:41 PM, May 08, 2005, Zita Dube said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
At 9:44 PM, May 08, 2005, Zita Dube said…
I disagree Roman, mainly because I don't see this as ranting about my job. I love my job and I love the SU. I was frustrated at the lack of organization that occured during my first week. Given circumstance, I feel entitled to a little irritation. If you read my post, I'm not attacking anyone- or even blaming them (note the "accidently")- it was just a series of foul circumstances that annoyed me.
Given that my blog is a venting of my frustrations, it seems like a pretty appropriate place to do it. I don't think anything i said was particularly tactless or antagonistic and it's my hope that no one would be offended by any of my comments.
Zita
At 11:57 PM, May 09, 2005, Anonymous said…
Don't try the whole make excuses for it afterwards, trust me.
At 12:31 AM, May 10, 2005, Zita Dube said…
I didn't think I was "making excuses afterwards" for anything. Just clarifying a few misconceptions. I have no issues with anything that I've said.
Zita
At 1:51 AM, May 10, 2005, Zita Dube said…
I would love to know what part of my blog post deals with "Internal SU matters"- the irony is that the confusion of the last week has become a bit of an office joke. I don't see how it is any different from having a conversation with someone over lunch and telling them about a crazy work experience.
I would agree if I was defaming someone's character, accusing people of particular behavior leading to this series of events, or doing anything more than simply stating that it was a rough beginning. But I'm not. Just stating a set of facts that led to a difficult first day and being unhappy about them.
At 2:14 AM, May 10, 2005, "Steve Smith" said…
I agree with Zita.
That is all.
Post a Comment
<< Home